SupplierWiki curates detailed articles to help suppliers win at retail.

Don't let Walmart Post-Audits catch you off guard in 2025. Join Allie and Bekah to learn best practices for preventing and disputing Post Audits.

Prepping for Walmart Audits

Post Audits are preventable and disputable! Join Allie and Bekah to learn how to best prepare for Walmart Post Audits.

Articles

Choosing an EDI Provider: A Buyer's Guide for New Retail Suppliers 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

After months of pitches, samples, and negotiations, a major retailer has agreed to carry your product. But as the initial celebration fades, reality sets in. Your new trading partner has handed over a thick routing guide and a deadline — usually between 30 and 90 days — to become EDI compliant. 

For many founders and operations leads, this is the moment where the pressure mounts. You need a way to receive purchase orders (POs, EDI 850) and send invoices (EDI 810) and advance ship notices (ASNs, EDI 856) without getting buried in manual data entry or hit with massive compliance fines. Under this kind of deadline pressure, it is tempting to treat selecting an EDI provider like a simple procurement task: Find the vendor with the lowest upfront cost that clears the retailer's minimum technical specifications. 

However, buying EDI is a multi-year operational commitment, not a one-time software purchase. The provider you choose today will determine how much time your team spends on manual work, how quickly you can scale to a second or third retailer, and how many thousands of dollars you might lose to chargebacks that your provider failed to catch. 

Reframe the Decision: Operational Health Over Procurement Price 

The most expensive EDI solution is the one that is cheap on day one but fails on day 100. The real cost of EDI shows up in scaling pain, integration debt, and compliance penalties, not the upfront invoice. 

 enforcement has grown significantly stricter in recent years. Major players like Walmart and Target utilize automated systems to track every case, pallet, and shipment. If your ASN is late or contains a single data mismatch, you can expect a deduction that eats directly into your margins. Treating EDI as a checkbox allows these errors to slip through the cracks. Instead, you should view your EDI provider as the operational infrastructure that protects your bottom line. 

To make an informed choice for an EDI provider in a fragmented market, you need to understand which category of provider fits with your current internal resources as well as with your growth trajectory. There are a few different types of providers you can choose from.  

These providers act as an extension of your operations team. They handle the heavy lifting of implementation, mapping updates, and trading partner communication. While the service fee may be higher, the trade-off is a significant reduction in manual labor and chargeback risk. 

This type of EDI provider is often the best fit for: 

These are lighter-touch software tools that give you the portal to manage EDI yourself. They are often a viable starting point for suppliers with very low transaction volumes or a narrow retailer mix. However, the burden of maintaining compliance and troubleshooting errors falls squarely on your team. 

 players often offer EDI as an add-on to their broader system-connecting capabilities. While attractive for tech-heavy teams that want to centralize everything, these modules sometimes lack the deep, retailer-specific expertise required to manage the nuances of complex grocery or big-box routing guides. 

 is rarely advisable for modern retail suppliers. The sheer volume of mapping updates required when retailers change their specifications makes this a massive drain on engineering resources. 

The Evaluation Criteria That Actually Matter 

When you are reviewing quotes and watching demos, look beyond the user interface. You need to pressure-test the provider against an operational framework that considers your long-term success. 

Retailer Coverage and Mapping Breadth  

Does the provider already have an active relationship with your specific retailer? A provider that understands the unique requirements of a grocer like KeHE or UNFI can get you live much faster than one that has to build a new connection from scratch. Ask how many thousands of trading partner requirements they already have mapped in their network. 

ASN Accuracy and Chargeback Prevention  

. Your provider should be able to do more than just transmit the data. Rather, they should have built-in validation rules that catch errors — like a missing pallet ID or an incorrect item count — before the document ever reaches the retailer. 

Retailers change their EDI specifications frequently. You need to know how the provider handles these updates. Is it a managed service they perform automatically for all customers on their network, or is it a professional services project they will bill you for every time a retailer changes a data field? 

Manual data entry is the enemy of scaling. Even if you start with a web portal, your provider should have the capability to integrate EDI directly into your ERP, WMS, or accounting software (like Shopify, QuickBooks, or NetSuite) as your volume grows. 

To get past the marketing polish, ask these direct questions during your evaluation: 

Identifying Red Flags and Walk-Away Signals 

You should be wary of any provider that gives vague answers regarding implementation timelines or treats mapping updates as billable professional services hours. A major red flag is a pricing structure that scales punitively with transaction volume. You don't want to be penalized for being successful. If a provider has no clear escalation path for support or cannot provide visibility into how they prevent chargebacks, they are likely not equipped to handle the rigors of modern retail. 

Most buyers compare the upfront price tag, but the real comparison is the total cost over three to five years. To calculate your true TCO, you must include the cost of internal labor to manage the system, the potential professional services fees for adding new retailers, and the cost of chargebacks absorbed due to provider gaps. 

Consider insurgent brands like those on 

. Many of these fast-growing companies choose providers that offer scalability because they know that the cost of migrating EDI systems mid-flight is far higher than the price difference between a budget provider and a full-service leader. For example, some brands have reported cutting 60 hours of manual work weekly after moving to a more automated system, allowing them to redirect those resources toward growth rather than troubleshooting data errors. 

Choosing an EDI provider is your first major operational test as a new retail supplier. By shifting your focus from cheap software to a reliable operational partner, you set your brand up to build a lasting, profitable relationship with your retailers. Don't let a compliance deadline force you into a decision that you will have to undo eighteen months from now when your growth outpaces your infrastructure. 

As you scale your volume and add new channels, fulfillment naturally becomes more complex. 

 is built to help your team stay aligned with partner requirements, reduce exceptions, and move every order forward with confidence. With a network that understands thousands of trading partner requirements and handles over 750 million transactions annually, we provide the automation and visibility needed to protect your bottom line. Whether you are launching with your first big-box retailer or managing a massive omnichannel expansion, SPS Fulfillment is designed to grow with you. 

Setting Up Your Operations Team Before Your First PO 

____________________________________________________________________________________ 

When the hard work finally pays off, culminating in a “yes” from a retail giant like Target or Walmart, the excitement can wear off as the dream quickly morphs into a logistical nightmare.  

The reasons are predictable: A founder or general manager assumes that their existing, lean team can absorb the operational load. But within two weeks of the arrival of their first purchase order (PO), the team is drowning in advanced shipping notice (ASN) errors, missed appointment windows, and a flurry of retailer portal notifications they don't know how to interpret. By the time they realize they need more help, they’ve already absorbed thousands of dollars in chargebacks and potentially burned through the "honeymoon phase” of credibility with their new buyer. 

Setting up your operations team should be a pre-launch discipline, not a post-launch reaction. To succeed, suppliers must move beyond the 

 and treat retail operations as an entirely new discipline. discipline. 

The Operational Functions That Must Have an Owner 

Before that first PO hits your inbox, every operational function needs a clear owner. This doesn't necessarily mean you need ten different employees, but it does mean you need a documented person responsible for each of the following workflows. 

Order Management and EDI Document Flow 

Successful operational function starts with 

. This involves continuous monitoring and processing of EDI documents and ensuring that every PO is acknowledged and every invoice is sent correctly. 

. If your dimensions, weights, or SKU details are off in the retailer’s system even by a fraction, it can trigger automated receiving exceptions and fines. 

You must decide which warehouse gets what stock and when. In retail, unlike DTC, you can't simply go out of stock without serious repercussions for your fill rate and future shelf space. 

Warehouse and Fulfillment Coordination 

Whether you are self-manufacturing, providing your own 

, and/or using a 3PL, someone must ensure that the physical product matches the digital order exactly. 

Every retailer has a routing guide, which is a complex rulebook for how and when they want their products shipped. Violating these rules is the fastest way to accrue compliance chargebacks. 

If an ASN doesn't arrive before the truck, or if the data doesn't match the physical pallet, the shipment may be rejected. 

Receiving Exception and Chargeback Monitoring 

Someone must be watching for deductions and fines from day one. If you wait until the end of the quarter to look at your checks, the money may be gone for good. 

Lessons from the Field: OLIPOP and Liquid Death 

While many brands treat operations as a figure-it-out-as-we-go, back-office task, the most successful insurgent brands treat it as a strategic advantage. 

, for example, expanded into mass retail channels like Target and Walmart

 their success was both commercial and operational. They recognized early on that succeeding in these channels required a deliberate operational buildout that matched their marketing ambition. This recognition prompted them to scale both their sales team and their discipline.  

 provides a masterclass in operational staffing. Rather than hiring generalists and hoping for the best, they made a point of bringing in veteran operators — people who had spent years at legacy giants like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Fiji Water. These hires brought with them the pattern recognition necessary to navigate the complexities of mass fulfillment and retailer-specific requirements from the jump. They understood that while the brand's voice was irreverent, their operations had to be institutional. 

How you staff these functions depends on your scale and resources. There is no one-size-fits-all org chart, but there are three distinct models that tend to work. 

This model is common for brands who are just entering their first major retailer. 

This model works best for brands that are scaling into multiple retailers or high-volume categories. 

This model is most commonly adopted by brands that have reached national distribution and want total control. 

The Gaps That Surface in the First 90 Days 

When a team isn't structured before the first PO, specific failure modes almost always emerge within the first 90 days.  

, which is when no one is officially responsible for validating the accuracy of ASNs. This usually occurs because the team is so busy just getting the truck out the door that they miss the digital errors that lead to thousands of dollars in fines. 

 Retailers frequently update their compliance manuals and routing guides through their online portals. If your team isn't checking these regularly, you may be shipping according to last month's rules, leading to a sudden spike in chargebacks that aren’t immediately explainable.  

, small issues (like a carrier missing a pickup) can balloon into major disasters because the person who spotted the problem didn't know who was empowered to fix it. 

Setting up your operations team is about more than just hiring people; it’s about documenting workflows and establishing ownership. Every person on your team must know exactly what they are doing the moment that PO arrives. By treating operations as a pre-launch discipline, you protect your margins, your sanity, and your hard-won reputation with the retailer. 

Once your team is in place and your operational ownership is clear, the next critical decision is the infrastructure they will run on.  

 provides the foundation layer your team needs to succeed. It replaces manual, error-prone tasks with automated EDI document flows and built-in retailer compliance specs, allowing your team to focus on making smart operational decisions rather than fighting with technology.  

Whether you are scaling to your first retailer or your fiftieth, 

 helps you move work forward with confidence and keep every order moving. 

Ingredient Disclosure and "Clean Beauty" Standards

"Clean beauty" is one of the most powerful labels in cosmetics retail. However, unlike what many consumers assume, the term has no legal meaning associated with it.  

In retail, clean beauty generally refers to products made without ingredients a brand or retailer considers potentially harmful, like parabens, phthalates, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, generally known as 

. The FDA does not approve or define cosmetic ingredients before market, apart from color additives and a short prohibited list, and neither the FDA nor the FTC defines "clean" at all. Each retailer sets its own standard and marks qualifying products with a badge. 

That is why a skincare brand can formulate a product carefully, earn a clean badge at one major retailer, then get rejected by the next for an ingredient the first one allowed. For example, Clean Sephora restricts roughly 50 ingredients, while Credo, a competing clean beauty retailer, restricts more than 2,700. A product can easily clear one retailer’s restrictions and still fall afoul of another.  

A brand marketing a product as “clean” is meeting a stack of separate standards at once: federal disclosure rules, state ingredient bans, and divergent retailer lists, each enforced independently. The brands that handle it well treat clean as a data problem, not a label, keeping ingredient data accurate enough to map one product against every standard that applies. 

There Is No Federal Definition of “Clean” 

No federal agency defines what "clean" means in cosmetics. The FDA regulates cosmetics mainly through rules on adulteration and labeling, and it does not approve or define ingredients before they reach the market, apart from color additives and a short list of prohibited or restricted substances. "Clean," "natural," and "non-toxic" are marketing terms, and a brand can use them without meeting any federal standard. 

In the absence of federal regulation, the definition is filled in by everyone else, which is why a brand ends up answering to three separate layers of rules at once: 

The rest of this article walks through each one and shows why a product that satisfies all of them still has no single thing called "clean" to point to. 

Before any "clean" claim enters the picture, every cosmetic supplier owes a baseline set of federal obligations. 

, a cosmetic label has to carry an ingredient list, a statement of identity, the net quantity of contents, and the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor. This is disclosure law and it governs what you have to tell the buyer. 

The rules expanded sharply with MoCRA, the 

. It is the most significant change to U.S. cosmetics law since 1938, and it added enforceable obligations that fall directly on brands. The operative ones: 

, and missing either one can render a product misbranded. 

MoCRA also formalizes a documentation expectation. Brands are expected to hold records substantiating each product's safety under its labeled use, including ingredient data, stability studies, and toxicology reports. The formula itself is no longer separable from the paperwork behind it. If the FDA asks, the proof has to already exist. 

The takeaway for brands: Federal law is almost entirely about disclosure and documentation. It tells you what to reveal and what to keep on file but does not certify anything as "clean." That judgment is left to the states and the retailers, which is where the requirements start to diverge. 

State Ingredient Bans and Disclosure Laws 

Where federal law mostly governs disclosure, the states go a step further and ban specific ingredients outright. California moved first, and the rest of the country is filling in behind it. 

, signed in 2020 as AB 2762. It bans 24 specified intentionally added ingredients, including carcinogens, reproductive toxicants, and endocrine disruptors, from cosmetics sold in the state beginning January 1, 2025.  

 (AB 2771), which bars intentionally added PFAS as an entire class, also effective January 1, 2025. Then came 

, signed in 2023, which adds 26 more banned ingredients effective January 1, 2027, bringing the running total to roughly 50 and aligning California closely with the 

 (SB 312), takes the disclosure angle rather than the ban angle: It requires companies to report fragrance and flavor ingredients linked to health or environmental harm to the state's Safe Cosmetics Program database, which then makes that information public. 

The reason to start with California is that the others followed its template. As of early 2026, eight states had enacted class-wide bans on intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics: 

, with more pending. Each of these laws differ on which ingredients are covered, how trace contaminants are treated, and when each ban takes effect. 

For a brand, that is the real difficulty. A formula that is legal to sell in one state may be barred in another, and the bans are written against specific ingredients and their 

. Checking compliance is a matter of matching every ingredient in a formula against every applicable state list, by identifier, and keeping that match current as new states are added. 

This is the layer that actually controls shelf space. Federal and state rules set the legal floor, but a retailer decides whether a product is "clean" enough to carry, and each one draws its own line. These are private standards, not laws, enforced as a condition of stocking the product. 

Here are some examples how widely each retailer’s “clean” list can vary: 

Because each retailer's list is its own, a formula can clear one and be turned away by the next. For a brand, "passing" is a separate screen against every list that matters to where the product needs to sell. 

“Clean” Is Not One Set of Standards 

Take one SKU within health, beauty, and wellness. To be considered compliant and “clean,” it has to: 

Each regulation is written separately and enforced separately, and the product has to hold up against all of them simultaneously. 

This is where treating “clean” as a marketing decision becomes expensive. A brand that picks the word first and checks the requirements later tends to discover the conflicts: during retailer onboarding, when a buyer's compliance team rejects the formula, or at a state border, when a product already in production can no longer ship there. But by then the options are narrow. Reformulating a finished product, re-testing it, and re-doing its documentation costs far more than screening the formula against every applicable standard before launch. 

That is why "clean" is not a claim to make and defend. It is a set of overlapping requirements to track against accurate ingredient data. 

Clean Compliance and Ingredient-Data Discipline 

Here is what ingredient-data discipline looks like in practice: 

Clean Compliance Starts With Clean Product Data 

Every standard in this article asks the same underlying question: what is in this product, and can you prove it to whoever is asking. 

That is a product-data problem before it is a compliance problem, and it is exactly what 

 is built to solve. Assortment lets you keep your product and ingredient data in one place, standardize it to each trading partner's required format and attributes, and validate it against their business rules to catch and correct errors before the data goes out. 

That is the discipline a multi-standard world demands. Instead of rebuilding a spreadsheet for every retailer and re-checking it by hand, you maintain one accurate source of product data and deliver it to each partner in the format they require. When a retailer updates its list or you expand into a new channel, the data is already structured to be screened and sent again. 

 to see how to manage your product data so "clean" becomes something you can document, not just claim. 

Amazon International Returns Policy: What Sellers Need to Know

________________________________________________________________________________ 

The Amazon international returns policy outlines how seller-fulfilled merchants must handle return requests from customers in other countries. Under the 

, eligible international sellers must provide a returnless refund, a domestic return option, or a prepaid international return shipping label within two calendar days of a return request. 

Understanding these requirements is important for maintaining compliance, avoiding automatic customer refunds, and providing a consistent customer experience across Amazon marketplaces. 

Amazon updated its seller-fulfilled international returns policy in 2024, and the policy remains in effect as of 2026. 

These changes affect seller decision-making in practice: 

The shorter response window leaves sellers with less time to evaluate return requests and determine the most cost-effective resolution. Businesses that rely on manual workflows may need to adjust their processes to ensure return requests are addressed within the required timeframe. 

Sellers looking to improve visibility into order, fulfillment, and exception management may benefit from 

How International Returns Affect Profitability 

International returns can have a greater impact on profitability than domestic returns because sellers must weigh product value, shipping costs, inventory recovery, and customer experience at the same time. 

For example, a $100 refund does not necessarily represent a $100 loss. If the product costs $25 to manufacture and international return shipping costs $30, a returnless refund may be less expensive than paying to recover an item that cannot be resold. 

Beyond direct costs, international returns can also affect customer satisfaction, account health, operational workload, and inventory management. Establishing a consistent returns strategy helps sellers make faster decisions while controlling costs. 

When processing Amazon international returns for orders shipped to buyers in the nine European stores, three North American stores, or Japan, sellers must use one of the following methods. 

Amazon international returns infographic showing the two-day seller response window, international return requirements, approved resolution options, and the step-by-step process for handling international customer returns.

Amazon International Returns (2).png

If the item costs more to return than to refund, consider offering a full refund without requesting the item to be shipped back. 

Imagine you sell a pack of phone screen protectors for $10 and receive a return request from a customer in Australia because the item was damaged during shipping. 

Because the return shipping cost exceeds the value of the product, paying for return shipping would not make financial sense. In this situation, a returnless refund allows you to refund the customer without requiring the item to be returned. 

Method 2: Provide a Default Domestic Return Option 

Update your domestic return address in Seller Central. If you do not maintain a domestic address in the destination country, Amazon recommends using a returns provider through the 

Method 3: Provide Prepaid International Return Shipping 

Upload a prepaid return shipping label in Seller Central within two calendar days of the return request. 

Other Considerations When Choosing the Return Resolution 

The most cost-effective return option depends on the value of the item, return shipping costs, and whether the product can be resold. 

Many sellers establish internal guidelines based on product value and shipping costs so customer service teams can make consistent decisions within Amazon's two-day response window. 

Special Considerations for European Stores 

Under Amazon's Customer Returns for International Sales policy, sellers fulfilling orders from outside the destination country into Amazon's UK, Germany, France, Italy, or Spain marketplaces must either: 

For example, if you fulfill Amazon Germany orders from outside Germany, you must provide a German return address or offer a returnless refund for qualifying items valued at €25 or less, including VAT. 

Consider a seller who ships a $100 product internationally and receives a return request from a customer in Germany. 

Aside from direct costs, the policy may create additional operational considerations for sellers: 

How To Comply With Amazon's International Returns Policy 

Sellers can take several practical steps to stay ahead of return requests and avoid missed deadlines.  

Common Challenges for International Sellers 

The two-day response requirement can create operational challenges, particularly for businesses selling across multiple countries and marketplaces. 

Many sellers address these challenges through documented workflows, automation, and centralized returns management processes. 

The Supply Chain Source: Wider Resources, Instant Answers, Supportive Community 

 as a practical, retailer-specific knowledge hub for suppliers. And for more than six years, suppliers have used SupplierWiki resources to better understand complex retailer requirements, avoid costly mistakes, and work more successfully with specific retailers.  

But what began as a reference site for suppliers has now evolved into 

. Backed by the same experts that made SupplierWiki a go-to resource for suppliers, The Source offers a broader platform for professionals from every part of the industry to find answers, connect with peers and experts, and build a better supply chain. 

In this article, you will learn about how The Source helps supply chain professionals face complexity with confidence by providing:

The supply chain involves more than just suppliers, and The Source reflects this reality. The Source is now a hub for anyone who works in the supply chain to find answers, connect with peers, and stay current on what's new and noteworthy. 

Within The Source, you’ll find more than 2,800 resources designed for every member of the trading ecosystem, including: 

Start searching our library of articles, webinars, research, and more 

Finding answers to supply chain questions typically requires taking a fine-tooth comb to multiple resources and perhaps even sending an email or two, consuming time you often don’t have.  

 provides a fast track to the information you need. Built into The Source, it pulls directly from official industry rules, guides, and documentation to provide: 

Unsure of the difference between a chargeback and a deduction? Curious about Walmart’s compliance program? Need the steps to get your product into a retailer? Find answers to these questions and more 

Documents and articles are great at telling you what a rule is, but what's in the compliance manual doesn't always match what happens in reality.  

 bridges this knowledge gap by giving supply chain professionals a Q&A community space within The Source to: 

 of 60,000+ members and start getting the support you need to navigate an ever-changing retail and supply chain landscape. 

From comprehensive content, to expert-backed answers at the speed of AI, to peer-to-peer information exchange, The Source offers a complete research-to-answer path for supply chain professionals.  

 to start building a better supply chain. 

Packaging Compliance: Tamper Evidence, Child-Resistance, and Safety Seals

Two products sit side by side on the same shelf: a plain body lotion and a body oil. They look nearly identical. But they can carry completely different packaging obligations, based only on what is inside them. 

Most health, beauty, and wellness brands treat packaging compliance as a single requirement. It is not. Instead, packaging compliance runs across two sets of federal requirements, governed by two agencies, under two separate laws, each with its own trigger. The 

Get the split wrong and the exposure runs both ways, with safety-regulation penalties on one side, retailer chargebacks on the other. This article gives you a clean model for both sets of rules, covering who governs what, what triggers each requirement, and how those packaging decisions become the documentation and item-data attributes that move through your supply chain. 

: This article covers US federal requirements only, and because the rules are based on each product's classification and exact ingredients, brands should confirm their own items with qualified regulatory or legal counsel before treating any packaging decision as final. 

Is Packaging Compliance One Requirement or Several? 

In health, beauty, and wellness, packaging compliance consists of at least two distinct requirements, and they often have nothing to do with each other. The same product can require both, one, or neither. 

The first comes from the FDA, which governs tamper evidence. The second comes from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which governs child-resistance. They are separate agencies enforcing separate laws, and each decides on its own whether your product is in scope. 

What puts a product in scope is its classification and its ingredients, not where it sits in the store or how it is merchandised. A retailer's beauty aisle has no bearing on it. Two items that look identical to a shopper can carry different obligations because one is formulated as a drug or contains a regulated substance while the other does not. 

The FDA requires tamper-evident packaging for over-the-counter (OTC) drug products and a narrow set of cosmetics. Most cosmetics are not covered. 

So what does tamper-evidence actually mean in practice? It is an indicator or barrier that can't be breached without leaving visible evidence, paired with labeling that describes the feature so a shopper knows what to look for. The package has to show that it was opened, and the label has to tell the buyer how. 

The Consumer Product Safety Commission requires child-resistant packaging under the Poison Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA), with the detailed regulations in 16 CFR 1700. 

The trigger is the presence of specific hazardous substances at or above defined thresholds. Child-resistance is an ingredient-and-concentration question, decided by the formula, not by what the product is called or where it sells. 

In health, beauty, and wellness, those substances show up inside ordinary-looking items: 

So what does child-resistant mean in practice? The packaging has to pass CPSC protocol testing that measures two things at once: that most young children can't open it within set time limits, and that most adults still can. You can't self-declare a package child-resistant. It has to be tested and shown to perform. 

How Do the FDA and CPSC Requirements Differ Side by Side? 

The two requirements are easiest to act on when you see them next to each other. They share nothing but the package they sometimes both land on. 

 
A single product can be beholden to both, one, or neither. The only way to know is to check two things on their own: how the product is classified, and what is in the formula. 

The overlap case is the one brands miss most often. When a product is both an OTC drug and contains a PPPA-regulated substance above its threshold, it owes both requirements, independently. A medicated muscle rub that makes an analgesic drug claim and also carries methyl salicylate over the limit has to be tamper-evident and child-resistant at the same time. Passing one test does nothing for the other. They are measured, met, and documented separately. 

Packaging, Documentation, and Item Data 

Choosing the right package is only the first step. You also need the records that prove the package meets the requirement, and those records have to travel through the supply chain as accurate item attributes. 

Start with the documentation, because it is what you would actually have to produce on request: 

This documentation is what answers a regulator, satisfies a retailer audit, or stands up in a recall inquiry. A package that performs but has no paperwork behind it leaves you exposed the moment someone asks you to prove it. 

From there, the packaging decision becomes attributes in the item record that retailers consume during onboarding and ongoing setup. Whether a product is an OTC drug, whether it ships in child-resistant packaging, how the tamper-evident feature is described: each one is a field that has to be populated and kept accurate. 

That is where the two-sided risk lands in a single place. Inaccurate or missing packaging attributes create exposure on both fronts at once: 

The same bad attribute can cost you with a regulator and a buyer in the same week. 

Run every product through these steps before it ships, and again whenever the formula or pack changes: 

Packaging Compliance Where the Data Lives 

Brands who get packaging compliance right at the data level protect themselves on both fronts at once. The package and its paperwork keep regulators satisfied. Accurate item attributes keep retailers from issuing chargebacks for noncompliant data. And clean, current product data keeps new retail relationships moving instead of stalling on corrections. 

That last step, getting packaging attributes into item data accurately and keeping them there, is exactly what SPS Commerce Assortment is built to do. You share your product data once, in whatever format you already have it, and Assortment standardizes it to each retailer's attribute requirements, validates it against their business rules to catch errors before they ship, and delivers it to every trading partner in the format they need. Your packaging attributes land correctly the first time, across every channel and every connection. 

Articles

SupplierWiki curates detailed articles to help suppliers win at retail.

Prepping for Walmart Audits

Overview

Articles